Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 161 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 395 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 683 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 190 |
| Teachers | 112 |
| Researchers | 46 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Students | 13 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Community | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 26 |
| Turkey | 23 |
| Australia | 22 |
| Indonesia | 22 |
| United Kingdom | 21 |
| United States | 20 |
| China | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| Japan | 15 |
| Texas | 14 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedWeintraub, Samuel; And Others – Reading Research Quarterly, 1971
Descriptors: Educational Psychology, Interpretive Skills, Language Ability, Literature Reviews
Peer reviewedJournalism Quarterly, 1982
Summarizes research dealing with (1) the handling of controversial newspapers columns, (2) media exposure and attitude consistency about immigration, (3) alcohol advertising and magazine editorial content, (4) headline readability, (5) crime news in Black weeklies, (6) city magazine problems, (7) coverage of Vietnam veterans, and (8) researchers'…
Descriptors: Advertising, Attitudes, Blacks, Comprehension
Peer reviewedLange, Bob – Reading Teacher, 1982
Examines the arguments against the indiscriminate use of readability formulas. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Evaluation Methods, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
Peer reviewedGlenn, Allen D.; Lewis, Vicky Johnson – Reading World, 1982
Provides five key questions teachers need to answer in order to determine whether a textbook can be used effectively in the classroom. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Illustrations
Peer reviewedBryant, Jennings; And Others – Human Communication Research, 1981
Pictorial humorous illustrations were found to have (1) no effects on information acquisition and on motivation, (2) positive effects on appeal, and (3) negative effects on persuasiveness. (PD)
Descriptors: Cartoons, College Students, Higher Education, Humor
Peer reviewedJohnson, R. K. – School Science Review, 1979
Discusses the readability of some selected school physics textbooks and examination papers. It also presents three factors that affect readability: (1) Interest and motivation; (2) Legibility of print; and (3) Complexity of words and sentences. (HM)
Descriptors: Physics, Printing, Readability, Reading Interests
Peer reviewedStansell, John C.; DeFord, Diane E. – Journal of Reading, 1981
By understanding factors that can make reading difficult for students who are normally able readers, content teachers can facilitate comprehension in their classes. (AEA)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Content Area Reading, Context Clues, Elementary Secondary Education
Blinn, John; And Others – College Press Review, 1981
Reports on a study indicating that campus newspapers ought to be making efforts to find out whether their readers really want or read longer stories, such as in investigative or interpretive reporting. (RL)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Journalism, Literary Styles, Media Research
Peer reviewedLee, Howard D. – Journal of Reading, 1981
Reviews reading problems encountered in industrial arts courses and provides suggestions for how to deal with them. (MKM)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Industrial Arts, Readability, Reading Instruction
Robbins, Ruth H. – Curriculum Review, 1980
Looks at factors in the textbook publishing industry, especially costs and censorship, which affect the quality of available reading series. Notes the problem of readability and content bias. Finally, presents a checklist of basal reader evaluation criteria. (SJL)
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Censorship, Check Lists, Elementary Education
Peer reviewedFox, Barbara; Siedow, Mary – Clearing House, 1980
High school students were tested on their ability to follow directions written by content area teachers. Poor readers understood the directions only about half the time, which probably confounds their performance on classroom tests and assignments. Ways that teachers can make their instructions easier to read are suggested. (SJL)
Descriptors: Assignments, Classroom Communication, Content Area Reading, High Schools
Peer reviewedDurkin, Dolores – Language Arts, 1981
Explores professional educators' responses to the research contributions of cognitive psychologists, psycholinguists, and educational psychologists in the area of reading comprehension. Some of the contributions discussed are schema theory, readability, anaphoric devices, and questioning. (HTH)
Descriptors: Educational Psychology, Educational Researchers, Elementary Education, Learning Theories
Peer reviewedHill, L. E. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
A stratified sample of library books in an English junior school were analyzed in comparison to students' reading ages and interests. Findings indicated that the readability level of most books was too high and that a negative correlation existed between children's professed interests and the subject matter of library nonfiction. (Author/SJL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Correlation, Elementary Education, Library Material Selection
Peer reviewedAbbass, Mazin – Reading Improvement, 1979
Investigates the vocabulary and readability of 50 commonly used application forms. Lists the 100 most frequently used words on those forms and suggests that this list be a beginning point in reading instruction. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Job Application, Readability, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedBarzun, Jacques – Journal of Communication, 1978
Discusses three obstacles to reading: the overproduction and cheap production of books, the extensive use of computer technology which hampers the development of reading habits, and the general decline of good writing and of the teaching of good writing skills. (JMF)
Descriptors: Books, Communication Skills, Computers, Futures (of Society)


