NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 661 to 675 of 2,625 results Save | Export
Tibbetts, Sylvia-Lee – Elementary English, 1973
Suggests readability formulas might have some worth even though they do not take into account all the aspects of the child's oral language skills. (MM)
Descriptors: Measurement Instruments, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
Fry, Edward B. – Sch Libr, 1969
A recently developed readability formula which requires little time and few mathematical computations is explained. (Editor)
Descriptors: Books, Childrens Literature, Graphs, Readability
Gaver, Mary V. – Sch Libr, 1969
The author demonstrates the simplicity in using the Readability graph, and illustrates her comments with specific examples. (Editor)
Descriptors: Books, Childrens Literature, Graphs, Readability
Means, Thomas L. – Journal of Business Education, 1982
Describes a research study on the impact of readability of an annual report on the stockholders. Results of the study are presented along with implications for business teachers. Also examines the effectiveness of readability formulas. (CT)
Descriptors: Annual Reports, Business Communication, Business Education, Readability
Cramer, Eugene H. – Curriculum Review, 1978
Six of the most widely used readability scales are briefly reviewed and their original source cited: the Dale-Chall Readability Formula, the Flesch "Reading Ease" Formula, the Fog Index, the Fry Readability Graph, the SMOG Grading Plan, and the Spache Readability Formula. (SJL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Guides, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Trapini, Fred; Walmsley, Sean – Journal of Reading, 1981
Findings indicate that different readability formulas will not record the same degree of change in readability level if easier synonyms are inserted, sentences shortened, or text rewritten for simplification. (MKM)
Descriptors: Discourse Analysis, Functional Reading, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McAdams, Katherine C. – Newspaper Research Journal, 1993
Investigates whether news stories that are easier to read will be more positively evaluated by readers. Finds no support for that hypothesis. Suggests that intriguing topics might attract and challenge all readers and potential readers because reader interest appears to be accompanied by a host of other positive reactions. (RS)
Descriptors: Higher Education, News Writing, Readability, Readability Formulas
Tenopir, Carol; Jacso, Peter – Online, 1993
Reviews the factors to be considered in evaluating abstracts. Types of abstracts, content, length, writing style, comprehensive criteria for abstracts, readability, readability testing, compatibility with ANSI (American National Standards Institute) standards, and informativeness are among the topics covered. (12 references) (KRN)
Descriptors: Abstracting, Abstracts, Evaluation Criteria, Indexes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yu, Guoxing – Assessing Writing, 2009
This paper reports the effects of the properties of source texts on summarization. One hundred and fifty-seven undergraduates were asked to write summaries of one of three extended English texts of similar length and readability, but differing in other discoursal features such as lexical diversity and macro-organization. The effects of…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Writing (Composition), Undergraduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nardo, Rachel – General Music Today, 2009
General music teachers have a technology tool that not only helps students sing better, it helps them read better! Carry-a-Tune or Singing Coach--the technology that received a rave review from former "General Music Today" technology columnist Kirk Kassner in 2005--is now being offered in an enhanced version called TUNEin[TM] to READING.…
Descriptors: Music Education, Music, Music Teachers, Singing
Fry, Edward – 1986
Even though readability formulas are being used more widely than ever before in schools, libraries, businesses, newspapers, and government, there are critics who argue against their use. Criticism includes blaming the formulas for the "dumbing down" of textbooks, for being poor writers' guides, and for not taking into account the background or…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Difficulty Level, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burkhead, Marie; Ulferts, Greg – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1977
Using 48 college texts, comparisons were made of Dale-Chall Readability Formula results based on samples taken from various page intervals. (HOD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Ron F.; Smith, Kay L. – Journal of Reading, 1984
Reports on a study that examined 15 randomly selected issues of a newspaper to determine if the readability scores for stories written in different writing styles are consistent when assessed by different tests. (HOD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Newspapers, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thornton, L. Jay – Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 1984
Based on findings of a study analyzing microcomputer literature using the Flesch procedures, the author recommends that readability formulas not be used in assessing such instructional materials. (SK)
Descriptors: Computer Literacy, Instructional Materials, Microcomputers, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klare, George R. – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1976
Identifies and describes major factors interacting with readability measures in 36 experimental studies analyzing the validity of such measures. (RB)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  48  |  49  |  ...  |  175