Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 161 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 395 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 683 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 190 |
| Teachers | 112 |
| Researchers | 46 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Students | 13 |
| Media Staff | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Community | 1 |
| Parents | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 26 |
| Turkey | 23 |
| Australia | 22 |
| Indonesia | 22 |
| United Kingdom | 21 |
| United States | 20 |
| China | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| Japan | 15 |
| Texas | 14 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 12 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Groff, Patrick, Ed. – Elementary English, 1971
Readability measurement has been a problem to the teacher for a long time. A solution to this problem may have finally been found in a recent study by John R. Bormuth entitled, "Development of Readability Analyses." (Washington: U.S. Office of Education, Bureau of Research, 1969). (MR)
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Language Ability, Linguistics, Readability
Peer reviewedAlston, Doris H. – Educational Leadership, 1972
Describes research evaluating teacher critical reading ability and finding that chronological age is inversely related to critical reading test performance. (AN)
Descriptors: Background, Critical Reading, Data Analysis, Performance
McLaughlin, G. Harry – J Reading, 1969
Replies to Pauk's investigation, raising some questions about it and defending his own readability measure. (MD)
Descriptors: Correlation, Criteria, Predictive Validity, Readability
Peer reviewedOliver, Marvin – Education, 1971
Finding the readability level that challenges the child at his optimum level of instructional performance can help teachers provide for individual differences. (Author/RY)
Descriptors: Measurement, Performance Criteria, Readability, Reading Ability
Coke, Esther U.; Rothkopf, Ernst Z. – J Appl Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Computers, Evaluation, Instructional Materials, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewedRafoth, Mary Ann; Richmond, Bert O. – Psychology in the Schools, 1983
Examined the usefulness of terminology in psychoeducational reports with students, teachers, and psychology interns rating the usefulness of 25 terms frequently found in reports. Results showed significant differences in usefulness ratings, depending on major, category, and whether or not the rater had taken a special education course. (WAS)
Descriptors: Case Records, College Students, Higher Education, Readability
Peer reviewedHorning, Alice S. – Reading Horizons, 1982
Argues that both redundancy and propositional analysis (a strategy for analyzing meaning in a text) help to reveal the nature of the reader-text interaction and are two of the important missing elements in readability. (FL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Discourse Analysis, Readability, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewedMiller, Jack W. – Journal of Geography, 1982
Describes a study which examined how to improve the readability of maps for upper elementary and middle school students. Data were gathered through interviews with 96 students who were asked a series of questions requiring the interpretation of one of four experimental maps. (AM)
Descriptors: Cartography, Educational Research, Geography Instruction, Intermediate Grades
Peer reviewedBraby, Richard; Kincaid, J. Peter – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1981
Describes two software routines developed for authors of Navy training materials. SCAT (Systems for Computer Automated Typesetting) automatically composes and formats text, merging it with stored graphics, while CRES (Computer Readability Editing System) aids in writing readable text at the desired level. A six-item bibliography and eight…
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Editing, Material Development, Military Training
Peer reviewedKeller, Paul F. G. – Reading Teacher, 1982
Discusses a prototype computer program designed to calculate readability levels and explains why such a program is needed. Calls for support from others who can assist in the program's development. (FL)
Descriptors: Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Programs, Computers, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedSmith, Gerald; And Others – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1981
The Flesch formula was used to calculate the readability of 15 financial accounting textbooks. The 15 textbooks represented introductory, intermediate, and advanced levels and also were classified by five different publishers. Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's post hoc analysis revealed some significant differences. (Author/CT)
Descriptors: Accounting, Data Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Gallagher, Daniel J.; Thompson, G. Rodney – Journal of Business Education, 1982
Examines the readability of texts in basic junior level college courses in the fields of management, marketing, and finance. The readability model is described, along with its application and results. Specific texts and how they fared are listed in accompanying tables. (CT)
Descriptors: Business Administration, Business Education, Marketing, Postsecondary Education
Peer reviewedMacCormick, Kristina; Pursel, Janet E. – Journal of Reading, 1982
Assesses the range of reading difficulty in three sets of encyclopedias by correlating readability with grade levels. (AEA)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Encyclopedias, Higher Education
Peer reviewedGallagher, Daniel J.; Thompson, G. Rodney – Journal of Economic Education, 1981
To aid secondary school and college level economics teachers as they select textbooks for introductory economics courses, this article recounts how teachers can use the Flesch Reading Ease Test to measure readability. Data are presented on application of the Flesch Reading Ease Test to 15 introductory economics textbooks. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Economics, Economics Education, Higher Education, Readability
Warming, Eloise O.; Baber, Elizabeth Coe – Phi Delta Kappan, 1980
The authors present a 20-item inventory for textbook selection designed to supplement the Fry Formula or the Raygor Estimate readability tests. The authors argue that a harmonious relationship should exist between the text, its author, its intended readers, and the instructor. (Author/PGD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Guidelines, Readability Formulas


