Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 581 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1116 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1844 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 2598 |
| Ethics | 979 |
| Foreign Countries | 807 |
| College Students | 791 |
| Student Attitudes | 772 |
| Plagiarism | 689 |
| Higher Education | 668 |
| Student Behavior | 615 |
| Integrity | 585 |
| College Faculty | 354 |
| Undergraduate Students | 288 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Eaton, Sarah Elaine | 25 |
| McCabe, Donald L. | 17 |
| Sinharay, Sandip | 14 |
| Houston, John P. | 10 |
| Bretag, Tracey | 9 |
| Lee, Kang | 9 |
| Curtis, Guy J. | 8 |
| Frary, Robert B. | 8 |
| Osipian, Ararat L. | 8 |
| Trevino, Linda Klebe | 8 |
| Anderman, Eric M. | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 82 |
| Teachers | 77 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Researchers | 25 |
| Policymakers | 19 |
| Students | 14 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Counselors | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 96 |
| Canada | 77 |
| United Kingdom | 74 |
| United States | 51 |
| Turkey | 48 |
| China | 47 |
| Nigeria | 42 |
| Germany | 26 |
| South Africa | 25 |
| New Zealand | 24 |
| California | 23 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Rigol, Gretchen W. – College Board Review, 1991
The College Entrance Examination Board has not permitted calculator use on the Scholastic Aptitude Test because of unresolved concerns about equity, implications for test content, and logistical and security issues. Those issues no longer seem insurmountable, and significant changes are being introduced on many tests. (MSE)
Descriptors: Calculators, Cheating, College Entrance Examinations, Higher Education
Peer reviewedKuehn, Phyllis; And Others – TESOL Quarterly, 1990
Comparison of international and U.S. students' attitudes toward cheating revealed that, although most students rated such behavior as using crib notes, copying from another student's test, and allowing such copying as immoral and wrong, U.S., Arabic, and Spanish differed in their ratings and characterization of such behaviors as cheating. (CB)
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, English (Second Language), Foreign Students
Peer reviewedKibler, William L. – NASPA Journal, 1993
The second of a three-part series on academic integrity, this paper offers intervention strategies for evaluating the extent to which the ethos, policies, and programs used in responding to academic dishonesty are developmental. Presents framework consisting of seven components of intervention (honor codes, communication, training, faculty…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Developmental Programs, Higher Education
Peer reviewedWerner, D. Leonard; Heiberger, Michael H.; Feldman, Jerome; Johnston, Edward – Optometric Education, 2000
A survey of second and third year students (n=1,092) at 16 optometric schools found 5.5 percent admitted to cheating in optometry school (and 13.9 percent admitted cheating in college), a finding similar to that found for medical students, whose self-reported cheating ranged from 4.7 percent to 10 percent. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Graduate Students, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHendershott, Anne; Drinan, Patrick F.; Cross, Megan – Journal of College Student Development, 1999
Investigates the academic integrity climate of a mid-sized, comprehensive, private university. Seeks to assess gender differences in motivations surrounding cheating behaviors among 532 undergraduate students. Findings indicate that while both males and females are reluctant to report instances of academic dishonesty that they witness, there…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Environment, Higher Education, Honesty
Peer reviewedMcCabe, Donald; Trevino, Linda Klebe – Academe, 2002
Explores the rise in student cheating and evidence that students cheat less often at schools with an honor code. Discusses effective use of such codes and creation of a peer culture that condemns dishonesty. (EV)
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, College Students, Discipline Problems
Peer reviewedLupton, Robert A.; Chapman, Kenneth J. – Educational Research, 2002
In a survey of 443 U.S. and 174 Russian undergraduate business students, 64% of Russian and 55% of U.S. students reported having cheated; the two groups had different perspectives on what constitutes cheating; and 69% of Russian and 24% of U.S. students believed that fellow students cheated. (Contains 61 references.) (SK)
Descriptors: Business Education, Cheating, Cultural Differences, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedVaughn, E. Sidney, III. – ERS Spectrum, 2001
Instruction targeted at increasing student content mastery is the most ethical approach to test preparation and also addresses the overall goal of improving student achievement. Sound and varied classroom assessments can help address efficient time usage and reduce the gap between teaching and standardized testing. (Contains 21 references.) (MLH)
Descriptors: Cheating, Elementary Secondary Education, Ethics, High Stakes Tests
McKeever, Lucy – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2006
Although the exponential growth of the Internet has made it easier than ever to carry out plagiarism, it has also made it much easier to detect. This paper gives an overview of the many different methods of detecting web-based plagiarism which are currently available, assessing practical matters such as cost, functionality and performance.…
Descriptors: Plagiarism, Internet, Cheating, Web Sites
van der Linden, Wim J.; Sotaridona, Leonardo – Journal of Educational Measurement, 2004
A statistical test for the detection of answer copying on multiple-choice tests is presented. The test is based on the idea that the answers of examinees to test items may be the result of three possible processes: (1) knowing, (2) guessing, and (3) copying, but that examinees who do not have access to the answers of other examinees can arrive at…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Test Items, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Distributions
Benos, Dale J.; Fabres, Jorge; Farmer, John; Gutierrez, Jessica P.; Hennessy, Kristin; Kosek, David; Lee, Joo Hyoung; Olteanu, Dragos; Russell, Tara; Wang, Kai – Advances in Physiology Education, 2005
This article summarizes the major categories of ethical violations encountered during submission, review, and publication of scientific articles. We discuss data fabrication and falsification, plagiarism, redundant and duplicate publication, conflict of interest, authorship, animal and human welfare, and reviewer responsibility. In each section,…
Descriptors: Cheating, Ethics, Periodicals, Writing for Publication
Baron, Julie; Crooks, Steven M. – TechTrends Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 2005
This paper reviews the literature relative to academic dishonesty in WBDE settings assuming the average class size to be 30-50 students with the instructor filling the role of facilitator, concept expert, grader and mentor when necessary. It shows that some common stereotypes about academic integrity and WBDE are unsubstantiated. In addition, it…
Descriptors: Integrity, Distance Education, Higher Education, Ethics
Willen, Matthew S. – Liberal Education, 2004
If frequiency of e-mail distribution is any indication, college professors and administrators indeed took notice of last fall's article in the New York Times, "A Campus Fad That's Being Copied: Internet Plagiarism" (Rimer 2003), on Rutgers Professor Donald L. McCabe's recent study of cheating in college and universities. Four copies of the…
Descriptors: Internet, Writing (Composition), Copyrights, Educational Environment
Rettinger, David A.; Jordan, Augustus E.; Peschiera, Francisco – Research in Higher Education, 2004
This study uses students' evaluations of a hypothetical situation to assess their beliefs about other students' decisions to cheat on an exam. Participants read a vignette describing an examination in which the protagonist has the opportunity to cheat. The description of the vignette's protagonist was manipulated with respect to his perceived…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Cognitive Ability, Cheating, Tests
Malesic, Jonathan – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2006
In this article, the author explores the reasons why students engage in plagiarism. Students perceive plagiarism to be standard practice at their college. They believe that any means to a good grade are legitimate. He further asserts that students plagiarize in ways that are extremely easy to catch. They cut and paste without thinking to cover…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Plagiarism, Ethics, Cheating

Direct link
