Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 47 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 409 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1742 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2960 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 174 |
| Practitioners | 118 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Counselors | 14 |
| Students | 10 |
| Administrators | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 148 |
| Netherlands | 122 |
| Australia | 99 |
| California | 83 |
| Germany | 83 |
| United States | 66 |
| United Kingdom | 61 |
| China | 60 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 57 |
| Spain | 56 |
| Turkey | 56 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 10 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 13 |
| Does not meet standards | 6 |
Fogelman, K. R. – Educ Res, 1969
One must be extremely careful about reaching decisions concerning the state of a child's cognitive development on the basis of the results of tests that are highly unreliable in their present form. (CK)
Descriptors: Experimental Programs, Group Testing, Intelligence Tests
Walker, Ronald E.; And Others – Psychol Sch, 1970
Supports, generally, results of Walker and Spence study of 1964. Also demonstrates that subjects who are affected negatively by experimental procedure are likely to perform poorly on a variety of tasks. (Author/CJ)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Performance Factors
Paulson, Morris J.; Lin, Tien-Teh – J Clin Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Predictive Measurement, Test Results
Peer reviewedForehand, Rex; Gordon, Donald A. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1971
Descriptors: Exceptional Child Research, Intelligence Tests, Testing
Peer reviewedHersh, Jeffrey B. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971
Under positive referral conditions testers obtained higher IQ scores, rated the child more favorably on Factors Affecting Test Performance and made more favorable recommendations than under negative referral conditions, thus supporting the hypothesis that the referral agent does influence the testing situation. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Referral, Testing, Testing Problems
Peer reviewedAnastasi, Ann; Schaefer, Charles E. – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1971
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Definitions, Intelligence Tests, Testing
Sattler, Jerome M.; Winget, Barbara M. – J Clin Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Expectation, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Testing
Gayton, William F.; And Others – J Clin Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Children, Intelligence Tests, Test Interpretation, Testing
Peer reviewedPepin, Arthur C. – Clearing House, 1971
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Intelligence Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedMandel, Robert; McLeod, Philip – Exceptional Children, 1970
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Socioeconomic Status, Test Reliability
Callens, Charlotte J.; Meltzer, Malcolm L. – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1969
Reprints of an extended report based on an MA thesis from: M.L. Meltzer, Dept. of Psychology, George Washington University, Washington, D. C. 20006.
Descriptors: Anxiety, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing, Schizophrenia
Pine, Patricia – Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 1970
Descriptors: Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests, Test Validity
Reed, Homer B. C., Jr. – Nat Bus Educ Quart, 1970
Traditional psychological testing programs and the role of the teacher in providing individualized instruction are typical of the problems and prospects for integrating our knowledge of how brain damage influences intellectual abilities with common problems in educational practice. (CH)
Descriptors: Education, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Neurological Impairments
Zach, Lillian – Sch Rev, 1970
Descriptors: Blacks, Environmental Influences, Heredity, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedSilverstein, A. B.; And Others – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1982
The four items on the scale that favored the Down syndrome Ss all involved figural content and visual-motor ability. The five items that favored the non-Down syndrome Ss generally involved semantic content, social intelligence, general comprehension, and/or judgment and reasoning. (Author/SB)
Descriptors: Downs Syndrome, Intelligence Tests, Test Items


