Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 167 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 778 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1639 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2449 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 484 |
| Researchers | 103 |
| Students | 48 |
| Administrators | 43 |
| Policymakers | 13 |
| Parents | 8 |
| Community | 1 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 147 |
| China | 129 |
| Turkey | 72 |
| Iran | 70 |
| Australia | 68 |
| California | 49 |
| Indonesia | 45 |
| United Kingdom | 45 |
| Japan | 44 |
| Thailand | 38 |
| Saudi Arabia | 37 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Peer reviewedFreedman, Sara Warshauer; Robinson, William S. – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Discusses the design and scoring of the writing proficiency exam conducted at San Francisco State University. Explains the program's counseling system for those students who do not pass the proficiency exam. (HTH)
Descriptors: Counselor Role, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedGriffin, C. W. – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Examines some of the research on reasons for teachers' diverse reactions to student writing. Also looks at research on student reactions to teacher responses to their writing. (HTH)
Descriptors: Educational Theories, Higher Education, Student Attitudes, Student Teacher Relationship
Peer reviewedLynch, Denise – College Composition and Communication, 1982
Presents an evaluation method designed to help students at each stage of the writing process. The process includes a student self-evaluation scale for the prewriting stage, an analytic scale for descriptive writing used by peer evaluators and the instructor, and an outline of the evaluation strategy. (HTH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education
Knoblauch, C. H.; Brannon, Lil – Freshman English News, 1981
Examines 25 years of research on the effects of teachers' comments on and responses to student writing. Expresses the need for emphasizing writing as process, for using multiple-draft assignments, and for developing student appreciation and skill for revising their works. (RL)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Higher Education, Student Evaluation, Student Teacher Relationship
Peer reviewedGreenbaum, Sidney; Taylor, John – College Composition and Communication, 1981
Presents results of a study on how accurately instructors in composition identified various kinds of errors. (RL)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Educational Research, Error Patterns, Higher Education
Peer reviewedReed, Candi Mascia – Perspectives in Education and Deafness, 1997
Discusses using portfolios to evaluate the writing, vocabulary, and grammar of students with deafness. Describes the steps for student development and assembly of their portfolios for presentation and review. Also highlights student participation in the assessment of the portfolios and the benefits of portfolios. (CR)
Descriptors: Deafness, Elementary Secondary Education, Grammar, Language Skills
Peer reviewedWright, Wendy L. – Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 1996
Describes an approach for using portfolio evaluations with developmental students. Indicates that it includes a system for analyzing and practicing five areas of writing: form, function, authorial attitude, method of development, and point of view. Reviews benefits of the approach and provides charts of portfolio activities. (AJL)
Descriptors: Portfolio Assessment, Portfolios (Background Materials), Postsecondary Education, Remedial Instruction
Starr, Douglas – Community College Journalist, 1993
Describes the use of computers for grading assignments in beginning and intermediate reporting and writing programs at Texas A&M University. Indicates that students store assignments on a computer network, where the instructor can access them to grade them. Describes techniques for making electronic corrections clear and provides sample…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Computer Networks, Computer Uses in Education, Error Correction
Graham, Margaret Baker – Writing Instructor, 1996
Examines how conformity to gender or gender expectations can affect evaluation. Finds that women who write either traditional or non-traditional perspectives generally receive the same grade, but a non-traditional perspective is more likely to receive criticism. Finds also that the same is true of men but to a lesser degree. (TB)
Descriptors: At Risk Persons, Classroom Environment, Females, Higher Education
Peer reviewedHansen, Jane – Reading Teacher, 1996
Explores three aspects of evaluation: to find value in the content of writing; to promote writing growth (as children learn to evaluate themselves as writers and generate possible goals and strategies to attain them); and to rethink the role of teachers who value themselves as learners. (SR)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Literature Appreciation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewedWyngaard, Sandra; Gehrke, Rachel – English Journal, 1996
Puts forth a plan for raising student consciousness about audience through peer evaluation sessions. Targets three areas of effective autobiographical writing: an engaging opening; focus; and showing, not telling. Discusses grading rubrics for these categories appropriate for student readers. (TB)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Autobiographies, Peer Evaluation, Personal Narratives
Peer reviewedNemati, Majid – Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2003
Suggests English teaching in Iran has been a failure, partly because the language is not used as a means of communication, but is taught in isolated fragments. Discusses methods for testing writing, recommending essay tests over multiple-choice ones so the washback effect will encourage teachers and students to change their attitudes about…
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Essays, Foreign Countries, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewedStraub, Richard – Research in the Teaching of English, 1997
Examines student responses to their teachers' written comments on their papers. Finds that students are equally interested in getting responses on content, purpose and organization as on sentence structure, wording and correctness; and students prefer specific comments with explanations over negative comments or comments that seek to control their…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Revision (Written Composition), Student Attitudes, Student Evaluation
Peer reviewedGray, Robert – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002
Explains how professors can either "mark the screen" or use separate attachments in the grading process for on-line assignments. Discusses e-mail as the analogue of face-to-face conferencing for providing feedback. (EV)
Descriptors: Distance Education, Electronic Mail, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMonroe, Barbara – English Journal, 2002
Notes that professional reflection is a powerful aspect of practice and, in welcoming many "English Journal" colleagues back to another academic year, the author suspects that many are thinking a good deal about grading. Discusses the importance of feedback for student writing. Suggests the need to relocate teacher feedback to the public forums of…
Descriptors: Electronic Mail, English Instruction, Feedback, Grading


