Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 45 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 407 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1740 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2958 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 174 |
| Practitioners | 118 |
| Teachers | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Counselors | 14 |
| Students | 10 |
| Administrators | 9 |
| Policymakers | 5 |
| Support Staff | 4 |
| Community | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 148 |
| Netherlands | 122 |
| Australia | 99 |
| California | 83 |
| Germany | 83 |
| United States | 66 |
| United Kingdom | 61 |
| China | 60 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 57 |
| Spain | 56 |
| Turkey | 56 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 10 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 13 |
| Does not meet standards | 6 |
IQ Is Irrelevant to the Definition of Learning Disabilities: A Position in Search of Logic and Data.
Peer reviewedLyon, G. Reid – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
This response to a paper by Linda Siegel (EC221505) on the relationship between Intelligence Quotient and learning disabilities addresses the differences between classification and identification, limitations in Siegel's conceptualization of intelligence, and the representation of the language and learning domains subsumed within the learning…
Descriptors: Classification, Educational Diagnosis, Elementary Secondary Education, Handicap Identification
Peer reviewedRhyner, Paula M. Pecyna; Bracken, Bruce A. – Journal of Communication Disorders, 1988
Comparison of results obtained for 62 normally developing preschool children on the Bracken Basic Concept Scale, the Preschool Language Scale, and the Slosson Intelligence Test revealed low to moderate correlations between the three tests. Results suggest the tests do not measure the same abilities and thus cannot be used interchangeably. (DB)
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Concept Formation, Disabilities, Handicap Identification
Shaughnessy, Michael F.; Fickling, Kris L. – Gifted Education International, 1993
This paper reviews the advantages and disadvantages of testing for giftedness, the repercussions of testing and not testing, issues concerning intelligence quotients, and the effects of labeling children. (JDD)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Elementary Secondary Education, Eligibility, Gifted
Peer reviewedKorb, Kevin B. – Cognition, 1994
Critiques ideas expressed by Gould in "The Mismeasure of Man." Agrees with Gould that many scientists who studied human intelligence were racist, but disagrees that their work must therefore necessarily be dismissed. Disputes Gould's claim that factor analysts who study human intelligence have reified their factors and that factor…
Descriptors: Experimenter Characteristics, Factor Analysis, Heredity, Intelligence
Peer reviewedBausell, R. Barker – Evaluation and the Health Professions, 1995
This editorial provides an informal review of "The Bell Curve" (Herrnstein and Murray, 1994). The book, packaged as scientific writing, is an attack on affirmative action and on government attempts to foster egalitarianism. It is a political treatise that assumes that racial differences in intelligence are valid and genetic. (SLD)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Biological Influences, Genetics, Government Role
Peer reviewedPrewett, Peter N. – Psychological Assessment, 1995
The concurrent validity of 2 brief intelligence tests, the Matrix Analogies Test-Short Form (MAT) and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISC-III) using a sample of 50 urban students. The MAT and K-BIT appeared equally useful as screening tests. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Comparative Analysis, Concurrent Validity, Correlation
Peer reviewedSilverman, Linda Kreger; Kearney, Katheryn – Roeper Review, 1992
The Stanford-Binet IV is compared to the original version and criticized for having less power to measure the high end of intelligence and for having norms that discriminate against gifted students. Strengths of the Stanford-Binet L-M are pointed out, and use of both scales for different purposes is recommended. (JDD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedDarling-Hammond, Linda – Educational Policy, 1992
Examines the use of educational indicators to serve educational policy ends, the potential benefits and dangers of various uses, and how to forge guidelines for appropriate relationships between indicators and policy. Indicators should not be used as administrative controls or policy levers, but to illuminate educational activities and processes…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Decision Making, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedWilson, William M. – Mental Retardation, 1992
This article concludes that the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition is poorly suited for assessment of children less than five years old with possible mild mental retardation and for persons of any age with possible severe mental retardation. The continued use of Form L-M is recommended for these populations. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Handicap Identification, Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedSpilsbury, Georgina – Intelligence, 1992
The hypothesis that a task that increases in complexity (increasing its correlation with a central measure of intelligence) does so by increasing its dimensionality by tapping individual differences or another variable was supported by findings from 46 adults aged 20-70 years performing a mental counting task. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Computation, Correlation
Peer reviewedKaufman, Alan S. – Roeper Review, 1992
This assessment of the usefulness of the "Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised" and the "Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition" for gifted children found that both are technically superior instruments with sensitive items, exceptional standardization, strong construct validity, and…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Tests, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewedLaurent, Jeff; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1992
Validity studies conducted with the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale: Fourth Edition (SB:FE) are reviewed. Results support its validity as a measure of general mental ability and that it can distinguish between groups of youngsters with differing intellectual abilities. Recommendations are made for use of the SB:FE. (SLD)
Descriptors: Children, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Intelligence
Peer reviewedNaglieri, Jack A.; And Others – Journal of School Psychology, 1994
Examined relationships among planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive (PASS) cognitive processing tasks for a sample of hearing-impaired students. Results demonstrated that the PASS model was supported for the sample of 96 students, age 8 to 16. Bolsters other exploratory factorial studies which have shown PASS tasks to be consistent with…
Descriptors: Adolescents, Attention, Children, Cognitive Ability
Taylor, Ronald L. – Diagnostique, 1990
This article offers advice on interpreting intelligence quotient (IQ) data and other results from intelligence tests. Myths regarding the practical applications and broader implications of IQ profiles are debunked. Several warnings are given regarding test use along with general statements of intelligence tests' strengths and weaknesses in…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Elementary Secondary Education, Gifted, Intelligence Quotient
Peer reviewedWelsh, Marilyn C.; And Others – Child Development, 1990
Early-treated phenylketonuria (PKU) children and unaffected peers were evaluated on four executive function (EF) tasks and one nonexecutive task. The PKU children scored lower than unaffected children on EF tasks, but not on the nonexecutive task. The PKU children's composite EF score was correlated with concurrent and mean lifetime phenylalanine…
Descriptors: Cognitive Development, Early Intervention, Intelligence Tests, Minimal Brain Dysfunction


