Publication Date
| In 2026 | 6 |
| Since 2025 | 444 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1942 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4086 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6792 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 644 |
| Teachers | 455 |
| Researchers | 440 |
| Administrators | 126 |
| Policymakers | 68 |
| Students | 68 |
| Counselors | 26 |
| Parents | 24 |
| Community | 10 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 608 |
| Australia | 341 |
| Canada | 254 |
| China | 180 |
| Indonesia | 149 |
| United States | 143 |
| United Kingdom | 130 |
| Germany | 118 |
| Taiwan | 111 |
| California | 110 |
| Spain | 107 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 3 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 2 |
Connes, Bernard – Journal of Structural Learning, 1973
Descriptors: Computers, Educational Technology, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedHenrysson, Sten; Wedman, Ingemar – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1974
Report discusses the construction of criterion- referenced tests and comments on future work with criterion-referenced tests. (Editor)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedDennien, R. T.; And Others – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1973
Tests developed for the evaluation of Control Technology, a basic engineering course of study in Great Britain, prove useful for the formative evaluation, but reflect the difficulty of assessing ability to solve technological problems. (Author/KM)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Curriculum Evaluation, Engineering, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedBhushan, Vidya – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, French, Intelligence Tests, Languages
Peer reviewedMaxfield, Margaret – Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 1974
Evaluation procedures meeting the criterion of "facilitating student learning" are discussed. Qualitative reporting with written comments to students is advocated. Other suggestions include giving a quiz during the first week of the course, allowing for retesting, and use of an occasional oral test. Some suggestions for grading are given. (LS)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Mathematics Education, Student Teacher Relationship
Peer reviewedWeis, Susan F.; Hubbard, Constance F. – Home Economics Research Journal, 1973
The Index is the result of an effort made to examine all components of vocational commitment and to translate this information into an instrument which could be used to assess the relationship of an individual to a vocation.. The predictive ability of the 74-item device requires further research. (Author/AG)
Descriptors: Measurement Instruments, Predictive Validity, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedHarter, Susan; Zigler, Edward – Developmental Psychology, 1974
Several measures of effectance motivation were constructed; their validity was assessed by administering them to groups of subjects whose effectance motivation was assumed to differ: normal, noninstitutionalized retarded, and institutionalized children matched on mental age. (CS)
Descriptors: Curiosity, Elementary School Students, Handicapped Children, Institutionalized Persons
Peer reviewedPassmore, David L. – Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 1973
Descriptors: Cognitive Measurement, Individual Testing, Item Analysis, Measurement
Peer reviewedTipton, Martha J.; Weaver, Carl H. – Central States Speech Journal, 1973
Descriptors: Intermediate Grades, Listening, Listening Comprehension Tests, Listening Skills
Peer reviewedPyrczak, Fred – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973
Despite the numerous individual illustrations in the literature showing how the discrimination index may be used to identify items with faults, its overall effectiveness as a measure of item quality, defined in terms of the presence or absence of faults, is not clear. This study investigates its validity. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Correlation, Discriminant Analysis, Item Banks, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedWarren, Richard D.; And Others – Home Economics Research Journal, 1973
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Cluster Analysis, Item Analysis, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedBeere, Carole A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1973
Descriptors: Attitudes, Childhood Attitudes, Construction (Process), Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedDziuban, Charles D.; Vickery, Kenneth V. – Educational Leadership, 1973
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Measurement Techniques, Standardized Tests, Test Construction
Westbrook, Bert W.; Mastie, Marjorie M. – Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 1973
Purposes, construction, evidence of validity and reliability, and strengths and weaknesses of the measures are contrasted. All have strengths and limitations that might be remedied through further research and development. (Author)
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Career Development, Decision Making, Measurement
Dew, Donald; Jensen, Paul J. – Speech Monographs, 1973
Descriptors: Language Research, Measurement Instruments, Performance Tests, Phonemes


