Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 10 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 49 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 145 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
| Canada | 10 |
| Australia | 8 |
| Tennessee | 8 |
| United Kingdom | 7 |
| California | 4 |
| Kansas | 4 |
| Massachusetts | 4 |
| New Jersey | 4 |
| United States | 4 |
| Illinois | 3 |
| Michigan | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCangelosi, James S. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1984
Test development procedures and six methods for determining cut-off scores are briefly described. An alternate method, appropriate when the test developer also determines the cut-off score, is suggested. Unlike other methods, the standard is set during the test development stage. Its computations are intelligible to nonstatistically-oriented…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Elementary Secondary Education, Error of Measurement
Impara, James C.; Giraud, Gerald; Plake, Barbara S. – 2000
A study was conducted to explore empirically the effect of different definitions of the target examinee on the judgment of panelists setting a passing score. Two cut score studies were done in a school district for the same test within a 6-month period, and different definitions of the target candidate were provided for each study. In October…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Definitions, Groups, High Schools
Peer reviewedTyler, Ralph W. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1983
Following a review of educational standard-setting experiences in the United States, the procedures used by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to arrive at a consensus on educational objectives are described. These objectives represent the only definitions of educational quality that are widely accepted by professional and lay…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Educational Assessment, Educational Objectives
Peer reviewedGross, Leon J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1982
Addressing Glass' argument (EJ 198 842) that a lack of interrelater reliability is an inherent deficiency in the Nedelsky technique, poor rater training and the need for a group decision procedure are presented as standard setting problems. (CM)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedHarasym, P. H. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
To determine if a given standard-setting procedure will yield consistent evaluation outcomes, one of three parallel certifying examinations was administered to three classes of second year medical students. The results indicated that the standard-setting procedure is a significant factor in the determination of the evaluation outcome. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cutting Scores, Foreign Countries, Graduate Medical Students
Peer reviewedJaeger, Richard M. – Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 1995
A newly developed performance standard-setting procedure, termed iterative judgmental policy capturing (JPC), is applicable to assessments composed of distinct multidimensional exercises. The procedure is described, and results are reported from the application of JPC in a study involving a panel of 20 teachers and 6 performance exercises. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Assessment, Licensing Examinations (Professions), Multidimensional Scaling
Peer reviewedResnick, Lauren B.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1995
The New Standards Project has designed research to describe educational standards in other countries using an ethnographic case-study approach. Data review and analysis are organized by fundamental questions, the answers to which constitute a contextualized account of what students are expected to know and be able to do. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Benchmarking, Case Studies, Data Analysis
Peer reviewedHambleton, Ronald K.; Plake, Barbara S. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
Several extensions to the Angoff method of standard setting are described that can accommodate characteristics of performance-based assessment. A study involving 12 panelists supported the effectiveness of the new approach but suggested that panelists preferred an approach that was at least partially conjunctive. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Interrater Reliability
Peer reviewedMills, Craig N. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1995
The articles of this special issue propose two methods of deriving an initial standard and one method for determining the extent to which the standard should include compensation. Much work remains to be done on further development of the methods and the larger issues of policy regarding performance assessment. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Educational Policy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators
Peer reviewedNorcini, John; Shea, Judy – Applied Measurement in Education, 1992
Two studies involving a total of 99 experts examined the reproducibility of standards for 2 medical certifying examinations set under different conditions. Together, results of both studies provide evidence that a modified version of the Angoff method is quite reliable and produces stable results under varying conditions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Evaluators, Groups, Higher Education
McLaughlin, Milbrey W. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1991
Characterizing this special "Kappan" section on test-based accountability as a cautionary plea, this article sees five themes: tests seldom measure what matters; standardization gets confused with standards; tests constitute a limited reform lever; test-based accountability plans often misplace trust and protection; and the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Elementary Secondary Education, Multiple Choice Tests, National Competency Tests
Peer reviewedPlake, Barbara S. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1998
Credentialing programs were surveyed to determine the procedures they use to set performance standards on multiple-choice and open-ended assessments. Implications of the various standard-setting approaches for the National Assessment of Educational Progress are discussed, and it is asserted that generalizing from standard-setting in professional…
Descriptors: Certification, Credentials, Elementary Secondary Education, Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Wood, Timothy J.; Humphrey-Murto, Susan M.; Norman, Geoffrey R. – Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2006
When setting standards, administrators of small-scale OSCEs often face several challenges, including a lack of resources, a lack of available expertise in statistics, and difficulty in recruiting judges. The Modified Borderline-Group Method is a standard setting procedure that compensates for these challenges by using physician examiners and is…
Descriptors: Intervals, Standard Setting (Scoring), Measures (Individuals), Examiners
PDF pending restorationFaggen, Jane; And Others – 1995
The objective of this study was to determine the degree to which recommendations for passing scores, calculated on the basis of a traditional standard-setting methodology, might be affected by the mode (paper versus computer-screen prints) in which test items were presented to standard setting panelists. Results were based on the judgments of 31…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Cutting Scores, Difficulty Level, Evaluators
Chelimsky, Eleanor – 1992
In 1991 the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB) released a report interpreting the achievement of U.S. students in mathematics on the 1990 National Assessment of Educational Progress in terms of a set of performance standards. The NAGB had been designing and implementing an approach to defining basic, proficient, and advanced levels of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods

Direct link
