Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 16 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 97 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 393 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 808 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 159 |
| Practitioners | 104 |
| Teachers | 29 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 6 |
| Administrators | 5 |
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 59 |
| Australia | 34 |
| California | 29 |
| Canada | 28 |
| China | 12 |
| Florida | 11 |
| Missouri | 11 |
| New York | 11 |
| Ohio | 11 |
| North Carolina | 10 |
| Pennsylvania | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedMerrell, Kenneth W. – Psychology in the Schools, 1989
Examined uses and concurrent relations of Teacher's Self-Control Rating Scale (TSCRS) and The Walker-McConnell Scale of Social Competence and School Adjustment (Walker-McConnell Scale) through analysis of classroom teachers' referral of students (N=92) with academic problems. Found moderate to high levels of concurrent validity and significant…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Concurrent Validity
Peer reviewedOttens, Allen J; And Others – Journal of College Student Development, 1989
An academic anxiety coping scale was developed and tested to ascertain if students tend to employ functional or dysfunctional coping behavior in response to stressful evaluative situations. (Author/TE)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Behavior Rating Scales, College Students, Coping
Peer reviewedKurita, Hiroshi; And Others – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1989
A Japanese translation of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale was used with 167 developmentally disabled children under age 16. Total score demonstrated a satisfactory level of taxonomic validity and discriminated infantile autism and other pervasive developmental disorders from mental retardation alone. A satisfactory concurrent validity on the…
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Rating Scales, Children, Cultural Differences
Peer reviewedSater, Gary M.; French, Doran C. – Journal of Special Education, 1989
On a peer sociometric measure, 101 learning-disabled and 156 low-achieving students received lower ratings than 608 normally achieving students. Parent/teacher behavior ratings for 77 of the learning-disabled and low-achieving students found that children rejected in peer sociometric ratings exhibited lower social competence and more behavior…
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Elementary Education, Interpersonal Competence
An Examination of the Phenomenology and the Reliability of Ratings of Compulsive Behavior in Autism.
Peer reviewedMcBride, Joelle A.; Panksepp, Jaak – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1995
Four staff members completed 3 questionnaires evaluating quantitative and qualitative aspects of compulsive and autistic behaviors of 17 young autistic adults in a farmstead residential facility. Results affirmed the utility and applicability of obsessive-compulsive assessment devices in evaluating behavior of autistic adults. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Autism, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Evaluation Methods
Drinkwater, Sarah; Notari, Angela – Diagnostique, 1991
Professionals and 16 mothers of disabled infants/toddlers completed the Evaluation and Programing System-I and the Parent Form Level I, respectively. Results indicated moderate to high correlations between professionals' assessments and mothers' assessments, though mothers tended to rate children higher. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Comparative Analysis, Disabilities, Evaluation
Peer reviewedDoll, Beth; Elliott, Stephen N. – Journal of Early Intervention, 1994
Nine comprehensive observations were conducted of 24 preschoolers (8 with disabilities) in free play settings, with social behavior categories based on the work of Strain. Comparison of partial and complete observational records demonstrated that at least five observations were required to represent the children's social behavior adequately.…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Classroom Observation Techniques, Disabilities, Preschool Children
Sherman, James A.; And Others – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1992
Thirty-seven adults with mental retardation and 46 other people from the community participated in videotaped role plays involving 3 social skills (following instructions, accepting criticism, and negotiating to resolve conflicts). There were high positive correlations between the behavioral checklist scores and the evaluations of community…
Descriptors: Adults, Behavior Rating Scales, Conflict Resolution, Criticism
Peer reviewedTustin, D. Ron; And Others – Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1991
This study examined the relationship between scores on the Behaviour Disorder Scale (BDS) and other assessments of challenging behavior in 100 adolescent and adult Australians with intellectual disabilities. The study found that the BDS was reliable and could be used to identify people with intellectual disabilities who exhibit behavioral…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Rating Scales, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedFeil, Edward G.; Becker, Wesley C. – Behavioral Disorders, 1993
The Walker/Severson Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders measure was revised for use with preschool children. The revision consists of three hierarchical stages of increasingly time-consuming methodologies: (1) teacher rankings, (2) teacher ratings, and (3) direct behavioral observations. Testing with 121 children demonstrated significant…
Descriptors: Behavior Disorders, Behavior Rating Scales, Preschool Children, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedEpstein, Michael H. – Remedial and Special Education, 1999
Describes the development of "The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: A Strength-Based Approach to Assessment" for use with children with special needs. Reports on several pilot studies conducted to establish the scale's validity prior to the scale being normed on a nationally representative sample. These studies addressed content…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Special Needs Students
Peer reviewedGallucci, Nicholas T.; Middleton, George; Kline, Adam – Roeper Review, 1999
A study evaluated differences in ratings of behavior problems and competence from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) between samples of 78 gifted adolescents and 62 controls. Results found no reliable differences for any scales from the CBCL and a low prevalence of behavior problems in both samples. (Author/CR)
Descriptors: Adolescents, Behavior Problems, Behavior Rating Scales, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewedPipp-Siegel, Sandra; Biringen, Zeynep – Volta Review, 1999
This article describes emotional availability scales that are designed to measure parental sensitivity, structuring, lack of intrusiveness and hostility, child responsiveness, and child involvement. A child nonhostility scale is also described. The importance and potential use of emotional availability for educators of children with hearing…
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Child Rearing, Children, Family Influence
Peer reviewedCanivez, Gary L.; Perry, Amanda R.; Weller, Elizabeth M. – Psychology in the Schools, 2001
Investigates the short-term stability of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents for 124 randomly selected children in grades kindergarten to grade 12. Significant test-retest stability coefficients were obtained and mean differences across the retest interval did not exceed .8 raw score points. Results were similar to those obtained in…
Descriptors: Adjustment (to Environment), Adolescents, Behavior Patterns, Behavior Rating Scales
Peer reviewedTasse, Marc J.; And Others – Research in Developmental Disabilities, 1996
Analysis of teacher and parent ratings of 369 children with developmental disabilities on the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form provided normative data (means, T scores, and percentiles). Age influenced three of eight subscales on the parent ratings and one subscale on the teacher ratings. Gender did not influence subscale scores. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Behavior Rating Scales, Children, Developmental Disabilities


