Publication Date
| In 2026 | 3 |
| Since 2025 | 477 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2435 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 6615 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 18019 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 2140 |
| Teachers | 1218 |
| Researchers | 1054 |
| Administrators | 486 |
| Policymakers | 456 |
| Students | 176 |
| Parents | 147 |
| Counselors | 100 |
| Community | 61 |
| Media Staff | 17 |
| Support Staff | 15 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 784 |
| Australia | 691 |
| United States | 582 |
| California | 569 |
| United Kingdom | 479 |
| Texas | 414 |
| Florida | 403 |
| Germany | 392 |
| New York | 378 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 369 |
| China | 361 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 17 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 22 |
| Does not meet standards | 21 |
Peer reviewedEignor, Daniel R. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
The authors of the "Guidelines," a task force of eight, intend to present an organized list of features to be considered in reporting or evaluating computerized-adaptive assessments. Apart from a few weaknesses, the book is a useful and complete document that will be very helpful to test developers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Methods, Guidelines
Peer reviewedGlas, Cees A. W. – International Journal of Testing, 2002
"Test Scoring" provides insight into psychometric procedures as used by a professional testing company or in large-scale projects. The book contains an overview of standard test theory, a discussion of factor analytic theory, and an exploration of special applications and problems. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Factor Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Psychometrics
Obringer, S. John – Diagnostique, 1988
A survey of 97 school psychologists found that the majority felt they needed additional training in administering, scoring, and interpreting the fourth edition of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Thirty-four percent were using the fourth edition. Rank ordering of instruments of choice was: Wechsler scales, Kaufman Scale, old Stanford-Binet,…
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Testing, School Psychologists
Peer reviewedKoch, William R.; Dodd, Barbara G. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
Basic procedures for performing computerized adaptive testing based on the successive intervals (SI) Rasch model were evaluated. The SI model was applied to simulated and real attitude data sets. Item pools as small as 30 items performed well, and the model appeared practical for Likert-type data. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedZappardino, Pamela H. – Clearing House, 1995
Presents examples of test bias and test misuse. Discusses FairTest (National Center for Fair and Open Testing) program areas and initiatives at the elementary, secondary, and higher education levels. Discusses keeping the community informed. (RS)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Program Descriptions
Jenkinson, Jo – Psychological Test Bulletin, 1991
The issue of test user competency arises from the question of restrictions on the use of psychological tests. The only justifiable basis for restricting test use is one that reflects the skills and competencies of the user. Ultimately, only professional judgment determines whether a test is properly used. (SLD)
Descriptors: Competence, Foreign Countries, Guidelines, Psychological Testing
Peer reviewedCox, Brian J.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1993
To study the distinction between self-reports of anxiety and depression, a factor analysis was conducted using responses of 298 anxiety disorder patients on the Beck Depression Inventory and the State Anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Results suggest that the two conditions can be reliably differentiated in self-reports. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Comparative Testing, Depression (Psychology), Diagnostic Tests
Peer reviewedKonold, Timothy R.; Maller, Susan J.; Glutting, Joseph J. – Journal of School Psychology, 1998
Two nested structural models are developed to determine whether test-session behaviors affect the manner in which intelligence is measured or influence the constructs being measured. Results indicate that test-session behaviors play a larger role influencing the mechanisms of measurement than on the constructs of intelligence. (Author/EMK)
Descriptors: Child Behavior, Elementary Secondary Education, Individual Testing, Intelligence
Peer reviewedWise, Steven L.; Finney, Sara J.; Enders, Craig K.; Freeman, Sharon A.; Severance, Donald D. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1999
Examined whether providing item review on a computerized adaptive test could be used by examinees to inflate their scores. Two studies involving 139 undergraduates suggest that examinees are not highly proficient at discriminating item difficulty. A simulation study showed the usefulness of a strategy identified by G. Kingsbury (1996) as a way to…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Higher Education
Peer reviewedMooney, G. A.; Bligh, J. G.; Leinster, S. J. – Medical Teacher, 1998
Presents a system of classification for describing computer-based assessment techniques based on the level of action and educational activity they offer. Illustrates 10 computer-based assessment techniques and discusses their educational value. Contains 14 references. (Author)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Classification, Computer Assisted Testing, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedVispoel, Walter P. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1998
Studied effects of administration mode [computer adaptive test (CAT) versus self-adaptive test (SAT)], item-by-item answer feedback, and test anxiety on results from computerized vocabulary tests taken by 293 college students. CATs were more reliable than SATs, and administration time was less when feedback was provided. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Feedback
Peer reviewedSawaki, Yasuyo – Language Learning & Technology, 2001
Addresses issues surrounding the effect of mode of presentation on second language (L2) reading test performance, reviewing the literature in cognitive ability testing in educational and psychological measurement and the non-assessment literature in ergonomics, education, psychology, and first language reading research. Generalization of the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Ability, Computer Assisted Testing, Language Tests, Reading Tests
Cutshall, Sandy – Techniques: Connecting Education and Careers, 2001
With increasing emphasis on accurate assessment and accountability, computer-based testing and simulation may signify the future for teachers wishing to keep current on technology in the classroom. If career and technical education is to use new testing technology, features such as authentic assessment and criterion-based testing must be…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Technology, Performance Based Assessment
Peer reviewedBennett, Randy Elliot – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2001
Describes the many causes of pressure to change large-scale assessment in the United States and suggests that the largest factor facilitating change will be technological, especially the use of the Internet. The Internet will help revolutionize the business and substance of large-scale assessment. (SLD)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Educational Change, Internet, State Programs
Peer reviewedRafferty, Eileen A.; Treff, August V. – ERS Spectrum, 1994
Addresses issues faced by institutions attempting to design school profiles to meet accountability standards. Reports of high-stakes test results can be skewed by choice of statistic type (percent of students passing versus mean scores), sample bias, geographical transients, and omission errors. Administrators must look beyond "common…
Descriptors: Accountability, Achievement Tests, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education


