Publication Date
| In 2026 | 10 |
| Since 2025 | 642 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2579 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5614 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 9210 |
Descriptor
| Test Validity | 21786 |
| Test Reliability | 10022 |
| Test Construction | 5897 |
| Foreign Countries | 4963 |
| Psychometrics | 2969 |
| Factor Analysis | 2942 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 2382 |
| Higher Education | 2250 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2085 |
| College Students | 1813 |
| Correlation | 1724 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 728 |
| Practitioners | 429 |
| Teachers | 142 |
| Administrators | 96 |
| Policymakers | 57 |
| Counselors | 36 |
| Students | 20 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Community | 7 |
| Support Staff | 6 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Turkey | 808 |
| Australia | 347 |
| Canada | 324 |
| China | 300 |
| United States | 188 |
| Indonesia | 172 |
| Spain | 170 |
| Netherlands | 160 |
| United Kingdom | 160 |
| California | 156 |
| Germany | 154 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 3 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedSwanson, Beverly B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
Samples of entering first-grade students were used to examine the predictive validity of the group administered Metropolitan Readiness Test (MRT) and the individually administered Meeting Street School Screening Test (MSSST). The advantage of the latter was found to possibly outweigh the advantage of efficiency in group administration. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Grade 1, Group Testing, Individual Testing, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedSuddick, David E. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
The use of the Test of Standard Written English (TSWE) with older students at the junior and graduate level was validated. Scores were found to be predictive of academic performance in an environment with a restricted grading system. (GK)
Descriptors: College English, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Language Tests
Peer reviewedNaglieri, Jack A. – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Explored the relationships of the Revised Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-R), Peabody Individual Achievement Test, and the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities in elementary students. The PPVT-R appears to be most appropriate as a brief measure of verbal comprehension, rather than a substitute for the McCarthy scales. (JAC)
Descriptors: Achievement, Achievement Tests, Elementary Education, Elementary School Students
Peer reviewedMoracco, John; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
The factorial validity of the Teacher Occupational Stress Factor Questionnaire was determined. Results provided partial support for the construct validity of the instrument. Item rearrangement resulted in changing the composition of three of the five factors; this was thought to provide data for investigating teacher stress. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Questionnaires
Peer reviewedParish, Thomas S.; Rankin, Charles I. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
The Nonsexist Personal Attribute Inventory for Children (NPAIC) was administered along with the Piers-Harris scale to children in fifth through eighth grade. A correlation of .49 was found between the two scales. The NPAIC was found to be a reliable, valid self-concept scale for females and males. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Self Concept Measures, Sex Bias, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedMacPhillamy, Douglas J.; Lewinsohn, Peter M. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982
Found good to excellent stability for the eight most used scales of the Pleasant Events Schedule across time periods of one, two, and three months. Analyses showed that the items and scales generally possess acceptable levels of reliability and concurrent, predictive, and construct validity. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Correlation, Measures (Individuals), Peer Evaluation, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Peer reviewedFishbein, Harold D.; And Others – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1981
Aims to develop new procedures to collect and analyze data pertaining to spatial development, to explicate a neo-Piagetian model within which these data can be examined, and to assess the validity of this model in tasks requiring perceptual skills and/or rotation (perspective) skills. (RH)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Children, Cognitive Development
Stewart, Bruce L. – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1980
The reliability and validity of chance-level scores should be investigated. Only a careful examination of such scores can suggest whether they are likely to reflect random responding or to represent a reasonable estimate of an examinee's ability. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Guessing (Tests)
Raffeld, Paul – New Directions for Testing and Measurement, 1980
Students who meet with repeated failure at the beginning of a test are likely to lose motivation to continue to interact with each item. Therefore, it seems better to recommend testing out-of-level for those students scoring at or below the chance score mean. (RL)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Guessing (Tests), Scoring
Peer reviewedWhite, Charles S. – Theory and Research in Social Education, 1982
Describes a study which tested the reliability and validity of the Barth-Shermis Social Studies Preference Scale as a measure of teaching orientations with respect to Barth and Shermis' three traditions. Subjects were 190 secondary social studies teachers. (AM)
Descriptors: Course Content, Educational Objectives, Secondary Education, Social Studies
Eggert, Dietrich – Exceptional Child, 1982
The Test Battery for Mentally Handicapped Children (TBGB) was developed for the psychological diagnosis of mentally handicapped children in West Germany to provide diagnostic information relevant to educational programing. Reliablity coefficients were completed, tests of validity were undertaken, and the utility of the TBGB for differential…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Foreign Countries, Mental Retardation, Psychological Evaluation
Peer reviewedKing, Lynda A.; King, Daniel W. – Psychology in the Schools, 1982
Describes the three major strategies for development of Wechsler Scales short forms. Presents an overview of the available validity data. Offers recommendations for future validity research. Concludes that while Wechsler short forms may be useful as research instruments, their clinical applications are extremely limited. (Author)
Descriptors: Intelligence Tests, Research Methodology, Research Needs, Test Construction
Peer reviewedLongo, Judith A. – Journal of Reading, 1982
Validates the college-level designation of the Fry Graph using comparative validity data. (AEA)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Materials
Peer reviewedDeno, Stanley L.; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1982
Three concurrent validity studies involving 88 regular and 56 learning disabled elementary students were conducted to determine the relationship between performances on formative measures of reading and standardized achievement measures of reading. The usefulness of the formative measures for continuous evaluation of student growth in reading is…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Elementary Education, Learning Disabilities, Reading Achievement
Peer reviewedWiig, Elisabeth H.; And Others – Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 1982
Study evaluated sensitivity of two independent rapid naming tests--Naming Pictured Objects and Producing Names on Confrontation--in differentiating 16 children (7 and 8 years old) with language and learning disabilities from 16 age peers with normal language development and academic achievement. The interrelationship between total naming time and…
Descriptors: Disability Identification, Language Handicaps, Language Tests, Learning Disabilities


