Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 430 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2576 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5851 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13973 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1456 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1077 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1255 |
| Canada | 1185 |
| Australia | 923 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 598 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 492 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedMyers-Walls, Judith A. – Family Relations, 2000
Evaluation of programs for families continues to grow in importance. The best evaluation studies involve collaborations between evaluation researchers and practitioners, but the two groups represent different cultures. This article provides eight suggested steps to improve collaboration through the determination of shared goals, clarification of…
Descriptors: Cooperation, Counselors, Cultural Differences, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLove, A. J.; Russon, C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2000
Describes efforts to build a worldwide evaluation community, noting events that resulted in an almost 200% growth in the number of regional and national evaluation organizations in slightly more than 1 year. Profiles some national and regional evaluation organizations that participated in a recent evaluation meeting and suggests some alternative…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, International Organizations, Program Evaluation
Phillips, Jack J. – Training and Development, 1996
Provides a basic formula for calculating the return-on-investment of training: (1) collect evaluation data; (2) isolate effects of training from other factors; (3) convert results to monetary benefits; (4) total costs of training; and (5) compare the benefits with the cost. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Training
Peer reviewedDedmond, Rebecca M. – Journal of Career Development, 1996
Outlines the criteria and necessary documentation in the Planning for Life program that are used to assess attainment of the seven Cs: clarity, commitment, comprehensiveness, collaboration, coherence, coordination, and competence. (SK)
Descriptors: Accountability, Career Planning, Documentation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedDavidson, E. Jane – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Explores the relative strengths and weaknesses of program theory as a tool for inferring causality and outlines a five-stage approach that makes increased use of inductively built program theories as it takes more deliberate account of the varying levels of certainty that are required for evaluative conclusions. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedPetrosino, Anthony – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Even simple program theory evaluations could be used in meta-analysis to provide benefits. Explores several ways to combine program theory evaluation and meta-analysis, using a hypothetical model and an actual example from a federal funding program. Outlines four potential benefits to incorporating program theory evaluation into meta-analysis.…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Meta Analysis, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedObrecht, Michael – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation/La Revue canadienne d'evaluation de programme, 1999
Describe the role of an expert panel in setting priorities for evaluative work. An expert panel with high credibility inside and outside the organization that is at arms length to both the organization and external stakeholders can bypass many communications filters and provide a distilled and clear reading of stakeholder concerns. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Needs Assessment, Program Evaluation, Stakeholders
Peer reviewedSidani, Souraya; Sechrest, Lee – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Presents a conceptual framework for putting program theory into operation. The framework incorporates variables that reflect theoretical concepts and implementation issues addressed in program evaluation. It organizes variables into input, process, and output categories. Discusses implications for program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedCooksy, Leslie J. – American Journal of Evaluation, 1999
Describes the evaluation of Project TEAMS, a curriculum-delivery model for middle school in order to stimulate meta-evaluations by readers of the journal. Encourages readers to evaluate the reported evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Meta Evaluation, Middle Schools, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMillar, Annie; Simeone, Ronald S.; Carnevale, John T. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2001
Provides managers with specific guidance on developing and using logic models. For the last 20 years logic models have been used largely in program evaluations to chart what should have happened and what did or did not occur as intended. Logic models start with inputs and work through processes to the desired end state, whether output or outcome.…
Descriptors: Administrators, Evaluation Methods, Logic, Models
Peer reviewedNevo, David – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2001
Makes the case that both internal and external evaluation are needed in the assessment of educational systems. Suggests some conditions have to be met to establish a constructive dialogue between internal and external evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedChelimsky, Eleanor – American Journal of Evaluation, 2001
Discusses the challenges facing foundations and offers a nine-part framework to suggest how an evaluation office can help foundations meet these challenges. The emphasis on capacity building is also of interest to organizations other than foundations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Philanthropic Foundations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedKarukstis, Kerry K.; Rowlett, Roger S. – Journal of Chemical Education, 2005
Academic departments and institutions are increasingly seeking professional advice through external reviews to enhance their curriculum, assess programs, develop research initiatives, and establish strategic plans. The Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) that has expanded its consulting program to provide a wider range of services that meet…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Consultants, Professional Services, Program Evaluation
Gigliotti, Christina; Morris, Matt; Smock, Sara; Jarrott, Shannon E.; Graham, Bonnie – Educational Gerontology, 2005
We implemented an intergenerational (IG) summer program at a colocated site for 2 consecutive summers to maximize continuity and enhance sustainability. We incorporated multiple methods to represent the views of key program stakeholders, including staff and administrators, parents who attended the program, and facilitators reports of the…
Descriptors: Dementia, Summer Programs, Preschool Children, Program Evaluation
Gallagher, James J. – Roeper Review, 2006
One of the most pressing needs in gifted education, and in education in general, is how to conduct a responsible evaluation. In this article, the author discusses one of the most important procedures in program evaluation, which is to distinguish between summative evaluation and formative evaluation. In summative evaluation, the data is being…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Summative Evaluation, Gifted, Formative Evaluation

Direct link
