Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 438 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2584 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5859 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13981 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1456 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1077 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1255 |
| Canada | 1185 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 598 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedSlocumb, Paul; Wiederholt, Richard – Roeper Review, 1982
A model for annual evaluations of a school system's gifted programs is presented. The evaluation should address objectives in five program goal areas: identification, curriculum, staff development, parent and community involvement, and the evaluation process itself. (DB)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Gifted
Peer reviewedLindvall, C. Mauritz; Nitko, Anthony J. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981
A design for evaluation studies of educational programs should provide valid and defensible inferences. Goals of evaluation are the identity of major components of inferences and specific validity concerns. Design problems may be resolved by creatively utilizing features of specific evaluations in designing unique conditions that permit valid…
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Program Evaluation, Research Design, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedSieber, Joan E. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1981
Responsible scientists/evaluators must be assertive contract negotiators who understand and respect the legitimate needs and obligations of all pertinent parties to the contract. Evaluators should not work under conditions that prevent them from providing an appropriately comprehensive and critical evaluation, nor that prevent useful secondary…
Descriptors: Accountability, Contracts, Evaluators, Legal Responsibility
Olson, Sandra K. – Aging and Work: A Journal on Age, Work and Retirement, 1981
Examines the literature from the last six years on retirement preparation in private industry. Research in four areas is reviewed: need for retirement preparation; extent of current industry programs; evaluation of these efforts; and alternatives to existing corporate programs. (CT)
Descriptors: Employed Women, Inplant Programs, Needs Assessment, Program Evaluation
Gehris, Dennis O. – Journal of Business Education, 1982
Discusses the nature of simulations in business education (how it differs from games and practice sets, purposes and disadvantages, and types of simulation) and the effectiveness of simulation in business education (evaluation, formal research). (CT)
Descriptors: Business Education, Office Practice, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Elements: Translating Theory into Practice, 1980
Reports findings concerning (1) identification of inservice needs of teachers, (2) the effects of different styles of inservice programs, and (3) an evaluation of the impact of inservice programs. (Author/RH)
Descriptors: Inservice Teacher Education, Literature Reviews, Program Evaluation, Teaching Conditions
Peer reviewedNeigher, William D. – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1980
In his review of Frank Caro's article, "Leverage and Evaluation Effectiveness," the author challenges Caro's assertion that evaluations are weaker than they could be because evaluators are in weak organizational positions to demand methodological rigor or full program cooperation. Caro's model aligning evaluation with regulation is…
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Evaluators, Federal Regulation, Human Services
Peer reviewedEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981
Robert Stake presents his views on responsive evaluation, naturalistic approaches to evaluation, the role of testing in evaluation, and the training of evaluators. (BW)
Descriptors: Evaluators, Interviews, Models, Professional Training
Peer reviewedSayegh, Alia – Educational Leadership, 1981
Research findings reveal that successful arts programs offer a wide variety of arts; incorporate the broadest possible range of stimuli, materials, tools, and processes; and focus on historical, ethnic, and formal elements. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Art Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Training, 1980
Evaluation specialists give suggestions for preparing the presentation of negative research results and evaluation outcomes to clients. (SK)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Communication Skills, Consultants, Organizational Objectives
Peer reviewedDemaine, Gail Carter; And Others – Mental Retardation, 1980
PASS (Program Analysis of Service Systems) 3 is an instrument designed for use in the evaluation of any type of service system used by developmentally disabled clients. A factor analysis of the system yielded six rather than two factors, which clearly suggests that the scale taps more areas than previously realized. (PHR)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Sapone, Carmelo V. – Educational Technology, 1980
Presents an evaluation model representative of specific programmatic components and based on issues of attitude change or personal development, process change or instructional development, and structural change or organizational development, for use in administrative and teacher appraisal. (RAO)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Models, Personnel Management, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedParker, Randall M.; Thomas, Kenneth R. – Journal of Rehabilitation, 1980
Problems related to the evaluation of rehabilitation agencies and rehabilitation education programs are reviewed. Questioned are the assumptions that even shoddy evaluation is better than nothing and that the consumer is one of the best sources of evaluation data. Corruption of data and selective or distorted reporting of results are discussed.…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Problems, Program Evaluation, Rehabilitation Centers
Peer reviewedSchroeder, Paul E.; Abram, Robert A. – Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1980
Thirty-four standards for vocational education programs in correctional facilities are detailed. The process of their development and field review are discussed, as are potential uses in correctional program planning and evaluation. (SK)
Descriptors: Correctional Education, Correctional Institutions, Program Evaluation, Standards
Peer reviewedCollison, Carol R.; Parsons, Mary Ann – Nursing Outlook, 1980
Shows that direct nursing practice is a viable role for the nursing faculty; that the issues involved are both manageable and complementary to the traditional university role. Defines faculty practice, presents available options, examines administrative support, and describes one college's experience. (CT)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Nurses


