Publication Date
| In 2026 | 1 |
| Since 2025 | 438 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2584 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5859 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13981 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1456 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1077 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1255 |
| Canada | 1185 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 598 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedKing, Jean A.; Thompson, Bruce – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
A survey of principals and superintendents from variously sized districts revealed that program evaluations were generally found useful (particularly by superintendents) but were judged by many principals to be incapable of measuring some important program effects. Administrators tended to interact infrequently with evaluators, placing primary…
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Elementary Secondary Education, Information Utilization, Principals
Peer reviewedMunro, Barbara Hazard – Journal of Nursing Administration, 1983
A model for program evaluation that was originally designed for use by educational evaluators has been found useful for the evaluation of health care delivery programs. The model provides the basis for comprehensive evaluation and could serve as a useful tool for nurse administrators in the ongoing evaluation of programs they supervise. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrators, Evaluation Methods, Medical Care Evaluation, Medical Services
Peer reviewedSaracho, Olivia – Education, 1982
Evaluation is essential to assess the worth of a program and to provide its modifications. An ideal evaluation program can be designed by implementing the experts' best ideas, provided they meet the needs of the program, and by involving those who are directly and indirectly involved in the program. (Author/BRR)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Consultants, Decision Making, Educational Practices
Peer reviewedYates, John W. – Educational Research, 1982
Outlines findings of a survey of teaching practice and teaching practice supervision in England and Wales. The survey identified a variety of approaches adopted regarding teaching practice supervision and attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of existing arrangements. (JOW)
Descriptors: Cooperating Teachers, Postsecondary Education, Program Evaluation, Student Teacher Supervisors
Peer reviewedKemmis, Stephen – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1982
Proposes seven principles of program evaluation to serve as guidelines for designing evaluation procedures in Australian schools. The object of evaluation is to generate useful information about the educational environment which can be used for decision making in the curriculum development process. (AM)
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Curriculum Development, Decision Making, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedRest, James R. – Hastings Center Report, 1982
Proposes that college level ethics instructors and psychological researchers collaborate for the sake of improving ethics courses, evaluating programs, and advancing research. Journal available from The Hastings Center, 360 Broadway, Hastings-on-Hudson, NY 10706. (AM)
Descriptors: Ethical Instruction, Higher Education, Interdisciplinary Approach, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedHeath, Linda; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1982
A problem for program evaluators involves a search for ways to maximize internal validity and inferential power of research designs while being able to assess long-term effects of social programs. A multimethodological research strategy combining a delayed control group true experiment with a multiple time series and switching replications design…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Evaluation Methods, Intervention, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedGale, Janet; O'Pray, Michael – British Journal of Educational Technology, 1981
Describes the derivation of, and rationale for, the methods used to evaluate a new clinical curriculum at the Royal Free Hospital School of Medicine in London. Thirty-three references are appended. (LLS)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Curriculum Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Yoloye, E. Ayotunde – Prospects: Quarterly Review of Education, 1981
Focuses on issues in evaluating educational change. Topics include what should be evaluated, management of reform and evaluation, evaluation as a threat, attitudes toward evaluation, factors in drawing up an evaluation plan, management information systems, evaluation techniques, financing evaluation, and indicators of success. (KC)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedSatin, David George; Saxe, Leonard – Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 1979
Three models of evaluation emerge: objective and independent, objective but serving one interest, and pseudo-scientific public relations. Evaluation of an interdisciplinary mental health education program and roles must all be attended to or the weak link undermines the rest. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Interdisciplinary Approach, Mental Health Programs, Models
Hawes, Jon M.; And Others – Training and Development Journal, 1982
Sales training programs require continual evaluation. The authors present a conceptual model of the interrelationships of planning, training, evaluation, and modification (IPTEM) in corporate sales training programs. (CT)
Descriptors: Industrial Training, Models, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedStufflebeam, Daniel L. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The author, chair of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, compares the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) and Joint Committee Standards and proposes that ERS and the Joint Committee consider merging their standard-setting efforts. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Materials, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedCordray, David S. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
In focusing on why and how standards might be incorporated into the evaluation process, two themes are explored: the extent to which the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) Standards differ from other recent standards-setting activities and their applicability to local and state-level evaluation efforts. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Program Evaluation, School Districts, Standard Setting
Doremus, Richard R. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1982
Explores the quiet demise of the Kalamazoo (Michigan) Public Schools' effort to institute a comprehensive evaluation system for teachers and administrators that was complemented by a merit pay plan. Reasons for the program's failure may include hasty planning and implementation and an overwhelming amount of paper work. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Secondary Education, Merit Pay, Program Evaluation
Hall, Burnis, Jr.; Barnwell, Eleanor I. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1982
Describes a study of the structure, development, activities, and accomplishments of the community councils in Region One of the Detroit (Michigan) public school system. Lists nine factors that contributed to the success of these councils. (Author/WD)
Descriptors: Advisory Committees, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Evaluation


